Soil macrofauna in Brazil: a bibliometric review and state of the art


  • E. C. G. Araujo Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • T. C. Silva Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • K. P. T. Chagas Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • E. M. Cunha Neto Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • J. C. F. Bezerra Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • C. H. A. Borges Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
  • V. C. Martins Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
  • C. R. Sanquetta Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • T. V. Lima Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco



Macrofauna individuals' knowledge and their environmental functions is essential to seek more conservationist forest management practices. Understanding how the publications are being distributed in Brazil, and what knowledge need to be discussed to direct future research. The purpose of this review was to compile and analyze all publications on soil macrofauna in Brazil until 2019, conducting a bibliometric and state of the art review. 60 documents were evaluated, it was analyzing institutions and authors, citations networks and terms used, forest sciences areas that encompass the most explored biomes, crop systems or natural environmental and the most studied soil macrofauna individuals. Since 2002, every year, publications on the topic indexed in the Scopus database. The Atlantic Forest was the most studied biome and although the North region has the largest number of states that have not yet developed works on the subject, the Amazon forest is in second place in terms of publications, together with Savannah/Cerrado. The largest gap in studies and areas of natural fields is found in the Brazilian North. The macrofauna individuals studied, the highlights are from the orders Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, Blattodea, Araneae and Hemiptera. Vegetation type was carried out predominantly in native forests, followed by pasture.

Biografia do Autor

E. C. G. Araujo, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Engenheira Florestal e mestra em Ciências Florestais pela UFRPE e doutoranda em Engenharia Florestal pela UFPR


ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, 2018. NBR 6022: Informação e documentação. 2. ed. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro, 8 p.

Anderson J.M. 1988. Invertebrate-mediated transport processes in soils. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 24(1): 5–19. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(88)90052-7.

Anderson J.M. & Ingram J.S.I. 1993. Tropical soil biological and fertility: A handbook of methods. C.A.B. International, Wallingford, 221p.

Araujo E.C.G., Silva T.C., Lima T.V de., Santo N.A.T dos. & Borges C.H.A. 2018. Macrofauna como bioindicadora de qualidade do solo para agricultura convencional e agrofloresta. Agropecuaria Cientifica no Seminárioria 14(2): 108-116.

Borges C.H.A., Souto P.C., Costa R.M.C., Novais D.B. & Souto J.S. 2016. Artrópodes edáficos em fragmentos de floresta ombrófila aberta na Paraíba, Brasil. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável 11(2): 26-32. DOI: 10.18378/rvads.v11i2.4212.

Borges C.H.A., Souto J.S., Silva A.C.F., Alencar. L.dos.S., Limeira, Santos A.C.dos., Souto L.S. & Souto P.C. 2019. Edaphic Arthropods in Fragment of Riparian Forest in the Semi-Arid of Paraíba. Journal of Agricultural Science 11(2): 236-243. DOI: 10.5539/jas.v11n2p236.

Brancher D. & Roza-Gomes M.F. 2012. Survey of edaphic fauna in forest fragment in the municipality of Anchieta (SC, Brazil). Biota Neotropica 12(3): 94–98. DOI: 10.1590/s1676-06032012000300010.

Coq S., Nahmani J., Kazakou E., Fromin N. & David J. 2020. Do litter-feeding macroarthropods disrupt cascading effects of land use on microbial decomposer activity? Basic and Applied Ecology 46: 24–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2020.03.004.

Decaëns T., Lavelle P., Measey G.J., Gioia C. & Jiménez J.J. 2006. The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology 42(1): 23–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.07.001.

ESA - Entomological Society of America, 2018. Common names of insects database (updated 24 August, 2018).

Huerta E. & Van Der Wal H. 2012. Soil macroinvertebrates’ abundance and diversity in home gardens in Tabasco, Mexico, vary with soil texture, organic matter and vegetation cover. European Journal of Soil Biology 50: 68–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.12.007.

Inward D. & Beccaloni G. 2007. That termites are eusocial cockroaches Death of an order: a comprehensive molecular phylogenetic study confirms that termites are eusocial cockroaches.

Lavelle P., Decaëns T., Aubert M., Barot S., Blouin M., Bureau F., Margerie P., Mora P. & Rossi J.P. 2006. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Biology 42: S3-S15. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.10.002.

Machado D.L., Pereira M.G., Correia M.E.F., Diniz A.R. & Menezes C.E.G. 2015. Fauna Edáfica na dinâmica sucessional da Mata Atlântica em Floresta Estacional Semidecidual na bacia do rio Paraíba do Sul - RJ. Ciência Florestal 25(1): 91–106. DOI: 10.5902/1980509817466.

Melo F.V., Brown G.G., Constantino R., Louzada J.N.C., Luizão F.J., Morais & Zanetti, R. 2009. A importância da meso e macrofauna do solo na fertilidade e como biondicadores. Boletim Informativo da SBCS 1(1): 38–41.

Morais Sobrinho R.F., Araujo E.C.G., Silva T.C., Lins T.R.S, Walter L.S., Reis C.A., Santana G.M. & Lima T.V. 2019. Distribuição vertical da macrofauna edáfica em áreas de dossel e clareira no Jardim Botânico do Recife-PE. In: Editora Uniedusul, Grandes temas em Agronomia. Editora Uniedusul, Maringá, 53-60. DOI: 10.30969/acsa.v14i2.975.

Paudel B.R., Udawatta R.P., Kremer R.J. & Anderson S.H. 2012. Soil quality indicator responses to row crop, grazed pasture, and agroforestry buffer management. Agroforestry Systems 84(2): 311–323. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-011-9454-8.

Pereira J.M., Segat J.C., Baretta D., Vasconcellos R.L.F., Baretta C.R.D.M. & Cardoso E.J.B.N. 2017. Soil macrofauna as a soil quality indicator in native and replanted Araucaria angustifolia forests. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 41: 1–15. DOI: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20160261.

Rousseau L., Fonte S.J., Téllez O., Hoek R. & Lavelle P. 2013. Soil macrofauna as indicators of soil quality and land use impacts in smallholder agroecosystems of western Nicaragua. Ecological Indicator 27: 71–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.020.

Schuber R.N., Morselli T.B.G.A., Tonietto S.M., Henriquez J.M.O., Trecha R.D., Eid R.P., Rodriguez D.P., Piesanti S.R., Maciel M.R.S. & Lima A.P.F. 2019. Edaphic macrofauna in degradation of animal and vegetable residues. Brazilian Journal of Biology 79(4): 589–593. DOI: 10.1590/1519-6984.184765.

Sofo A., Nicoletta Mininni A. & Ricciuti P. 2020. Comparing the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in sustainably and conventionally managed olive orchards. Geoderma 372: 1-8. DOI:

Valani G.P., Vezzani F.M. & Cavalieri-Polizeli K.M.V. 2020. Soil quality: Evaluation of on-farm assessments in relation to analytical index. Soil and Tillage Research 198: 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104565.

Velasquez E. & Lavelle P. 2019. Soil macrofauna as an indicator for evaluating soil based ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecologica 100: 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104565

Wang S., Olatunji O.A., Guo C., Zhang L., Sun X., Tariq A., Wu X., Pan K., Li Z., Sun F. & Song D. 2020. Response of the soil macrofauna abundance and community structure to drought stress under agroforestry system in southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 66(6): 792–804. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1639154




Como Citar

Araujo, E. C. G., Silva, T. C., Chagas, K. P. T., Cunha Neto, E. M., Bezerra, J. C. F., Borges, C. H. A., Martins, V. C., Sanquetta, C. R., & Lima, T. V. (2021). Soil macrofauna in Brazil: a bibliometric review and state of the art. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(3), 14–25.



Agricultural Science