Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Scientific Electronic Archives
Reviews
DOI: 10.36560/15820221569
Submitted: 2022-03-20
Published: 2022-07-31

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in dog – Literature review

Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso – Campus Universitário de Sinop
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso – Campus Universitário de Sinop
Consolidation, Fracture, Long Bones, Biological Osteosynthesis, Technique

Abstract

With the evolution of osteosynthesis in Veterinary Medicine, the use of biological techniques such as minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) has been increasingly recommended, which has numerous benefits by having as premise the minimization of iatrogenic trauma to the blood supply and adjacent soft tissues. This review aims to highlight the importance of using the minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with plaque (MIPO), its advantages and disadvantages and the main surgical approaches performed on the long bones (humerus, radio, femur and tibia) of dogs. MIPO is about placing bone plate through epiperiosteal tunnel, created from two distant incisions to the fracture focus, ensuring its preservation and the muscle envelope that surrounds it. In this way, it promotes stable fixation and restores alignment and bone length, preserving local biology, which contributes to rapid bone consolidation and lower complication rates, showing itself as an excellent alternative to conventional osteosynthesis in long bones of dogs.

References

  1. ALBERIO, R. L.; DEL RE, M.; GRASSI, F. A. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective study describing principles and advantages of the technique. Advances in orthopedics, v. 2018, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5904028
  2. APIVATTHAKAKUL, T.; CHIEWCHARNTANAKIT, S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the treatment of the femoral shaft fracture where intramedullary nailing is not indicated. International orthopaedics, v. 33, n. 4, p. 1119-1126, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0603-2
  3. BARONCELLI, A. B. et al. Retrospective comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open plating for tibial fractures in dogs. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, v. 25, n. 05, p. 410-417, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-11-07-0097
  4. BEALE, B. S.; MCCALLY, R. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: tibia and fibula. The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, v. 42, n. 5, p. 1023-44, vii, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.08.001
  5. BRUNNER, C. F.; WEBER, B. G. Besondere Osteosynthesetechniken. Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93180-2
  6. BUCKLEY, R.; MOHANTY, K.; MALISH, D. Lower limb malrotation following MIPO technique of distal femoral and proximal tibial fractures. Injury, v. 42, n. 2, p. 194-199, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.024
  7. CABASSU, J. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using fracture reduction under the plate without intraoperative fluoroscopy to stabilize diaphyseal fractures of the tibia and femur in dogs and cats. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, v. 32, n. 06, p. 475-482, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693413
  8. CORIS, J. G. F. et al. Osteossíntese minimamente invasiva com placa: revisão de literatura. R. cient. eletr. Med. Vet., 2018.
  9. DÉJARDIN, L. M. et al. Interlocking nails and minimally invasive osteosynthesis. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice, v. 50, n. 1, p. 67-100, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.09.003
  10. FLÔRES, L. N. Osteossíntese Minimamente Invasiva com Placa (MIPO) sem radiografias transoperatórias no tratamento de fraturas em ossos longos de cães e gatos. 2013. 58 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias na área de Morfologia, Cirurgia e Patologia Animal) - Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2013.
  11. FOSSUM, T. W. Cirurgia de pequenos animais. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2014.
  12. FRANCO, G. G. Células-tronco mesenquimais alógenas derivadas de tecido adiposo nas osteossínteses minimamente invasivas na tíbia de cães. 2019. 113 f. Tese (Doutorado em Cirurgia Veterinária) - Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, 2019.
  13. GAROFOLO, S.; POZZI, A. Effect of plating technique on periosteal vasculature of the radius in dogs: a cadaveric study. Veterinary Surgery, v. 42, n. 3, p. 255-261, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01087.x
  14. GUIOT, L. P.; DÉJARDIN, L. M. Prospective evaluation of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in 36 nonarticular tibial fractures in dogs and cats. Veterinary Surgery, v. 40, n. 2, p. 171-182, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00783.x
  15. GUTIÉRREZ, L. G. Osteossíntese minimamente invasiva com placa em cães e gatos. 2012. 39 f. Trabalho de conclusão de Curso (Bacharelado em Medicina Veterinária) – Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
  16. HARTMAN, E. A.; PERRY, K. L.; DEJARDIN, L. M. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of a distal humeral Salter-Harris type II fracture by percutaneous pinning. Veterinary Record Case Reports, v. 8, n. 2, p. e001072, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreccr-2020-001072
  17. HORSTMAN, C. L. et al. Biological osteosynthesis versus traditional anatomic reconstruction of 20 long‐bone fractures using an interlocking nail: 1994–2001. Veterinary Surgery, v. 33, n. 3, p. 232-237, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04034.x
  18. HUDSON, C. C.; POZZI, A.; LEWIS, D. D. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and cats. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, v. 22, n. 03, p. 175-182, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-08-06-0050
  19. IMATANI, J. et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for comminuted fractures of the metaphysis of the radius. Journal of hand surgery, v. 30, n. 2, p. 220-225, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSB.2004.12.009
  20. KAPLAN, D. J. et al. Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle. Patient safety in surgery, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0115-8
  21. KRETTEK, C.; MÜLLER, M.; MICLAU, T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury, v. 32, p. 14-23, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00180-2
  22. LI, A. et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus conventional fixation techniques for distal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, v. 38, p. 52-60, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.028
  23. LI, Q. et al. Limited open reduction is better for simple-distal tibial shaft fractures than minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. Genetics and molecular research: GMR, v. 13, n. 3, p. 5361-8, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2014.July.24.15
  24. PERREN, S. M. Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, v. 84, n. 8, p. 1093-1110, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B8.0841093
  25. PIERMATTEI, D. L.; FLO, G. L.; DECAMP, C. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 4. ed. Saunders Elsevier, p. 25-159, 2006.
  26. POZZI, A. et al. Retrospective comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation of radius‐ulna fractures in dogs. Veterinary Surgery, v. 42, n. 1, p. 19-27, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01009.x
  27. ROBINSON, W. P. et al. Perceptions of minimally invasive osteosynthesis: A 2018 survey of orthopedic surgeons. Veterinary Surgery, v. 49, p. O163-O170, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13299
  28. RODRIGUES, J. G. F. Tratamento biológico de fraturas ósseas com placa minimamente invasiva em pequenos animais: revisão sistemática, 2014. 25 f. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Bacharelado em Medicina Veterinária) - Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araçatuba, 2014.
  29. ROSA-BALLABEN, N. M. et al. Osteossíntese minimamente invasiva com placa bloqueada (Mipo) sem a utilização de intensificadores de imagem nas fraturas de tíbia em cães. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v. 69, n. 2, p. 347-354, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8960
  30. SCHMIERER, P. A.; POZZI, A. Diretrizes para abordagens cirúrgicas para osteossíntese de placas minimamente invasivas em gatos. Ortopedia Veterinária e Comparada e Traumatologia, v. 30, n. 4, p. 272-278, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-16-07-0105
  31. SERAFINI, G. M. C. et al. Osteossíntese biológica em tíbia de cão com aplicação de fixador esquelético externo: relato de caso. Revista Acadêmica Ciência Animal, v. 12, n. 1, p. 45-50, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/academica.12.01.AO05
  32. XU, H. et al. Callus formation and mineralization after fracture with different fixation techniques: minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction internal fixation. PloS one, v. 10, n. 10, p. e0140037, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140037
  33. ZHAO, W. et al. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis and open reduction internal fixation on proximal humeral fracture in elder patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed research international, v. 2017, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3431609
  34. ZOU, J.; ZHANG, W.; ZHANG, C. Comparação da osteossíntese de placa percutânea minimamente invasiva com redução aberta e fixação interna para tratamento de fraturas de tíbia distal extra-articular. Lesão, v. 44, n. 8, p. 1102-1106, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.02.006

How to Cite

Melo, L. M. M. ., & de Faria Júnior, D. (2022). Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in dog – Literature review. Scientific Electronic Archives, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.36560/15820221569