Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Reviews
Published: 2023-11-30

Agronomic methods aiming quality and production increase in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): An integrative review

Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Escola Estadual de Ensino Profissional Antônio Mota
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Estadual do Piauí
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Centro Universitário da Fundação de Ensino Octávio Bastos
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
Universidade Federal da Alagoas
Agência de Defesa Agropecuária do Estado do Piauí
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Bean, Management, Productivity

Abstract

In agriculture, plants are constantly subject to biotic and abiotic stresses, as is the case with beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). In this context, the implementation of techniques that help to increase agronomic traits is of high relevance. In order to identify efficient techniques adopted in the common bean crop from 2018 to 2023, the method of Integrative Literature Review was used, through the Google Scholar base, with the descriptors “Phaseolus vulgaris” and “agronomic techniques”. Among the publications found, only 5 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The analysis of these publications made it possible to identify techniques that positively affect the growth, yield and nutritional value of common bean, in addition to providing crucial information for professionals in the field, producers and technicians

References

  1. ABEBE, A.; TSIGE, A.; WORK, M.; ENYEW, A. Optimizing irrigation frequency and amount on yield and water productivity of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in NW Amhara, Ethiopia: A case study in Koga and Ribb irrigation scheme. Cogent Food & Agriculture, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1773690, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2020.1773690
  2. CAMPOS, K.; SCHWEMBER, A. R.; MACHADO, D.; OZORES-HAMPTON, M.; GIL, P. M. Physiological and yield responses of green-shelled beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown under restricted irrigation. Agronomy, v.11, n.3, p.562, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030562
  3. CHOJNACKA, K.; MOUSTAKAS, K.; WITEK-KROWIAK, A. Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy. Bioresource Technology, v. 295, p. 122223, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223
  4. COBB, A. B.; WILSON, G. W.; GOAD, C. L.; GRUSAK, M. A. Influence of alternative soil amendments on mycorrhizal fungi and cowpea production. Heliyon, v. 4, n. 7, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00704
  5. Costa Carvalho, D. D., Garcia Guimarães, M. ., Sampaio Barboza, M. E. ., de Freitas, R. J. ., & Rodrigues, F. . (2023). Produtividade de feijão comum cv. Pérola pelo emprego de ácidos húmicos no tratamento de sementes. Scientific Electronic Archives, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.36560/161120231806
  6. Corioletti, N. S. D., Corioletti, S., & da Silva, V. L. (2021). Influência da adubação bórica na cultura do feijoeiro. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(5), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.36560/14520211244
  7. EL SHEIKHA, A. F.; ALLAM, A. Y.; TAHA, M.; VARZAKAS, T. How does the addition of biostimulants affect the growth, yield, and quality parameters of the snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)? How is this reflected in its nutritional value?. Applied Sciences, v.12, n.2, p.776, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020776
  8. FONTANA, F. Técnicas de pesquisa. In T. Mazucato (Org.), Metodologia da pesquisa e do trabalho científico. Funepe, p.59-78, 2018.
  9. KARAVIDAS, I.; NTATSI, G.; VOUGELEKA, V.; KARKANIS, A.; NTANASI, T.; SAITANIS, C.; SAVVAS, D. Agronomic practices to increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a systematic review. Agronomy, v.12, n.2, p. 271, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020271
  10. LIU, Z.; HE, T.; CAO, T.; YANG, T.; MENG, J.; CHEN, W. Effects of biochar application on nitrogen leaching, ammonia volatilization and nitrogen use efficiency in two distinct soils. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition, v.17, n.2, p.515-528, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017005000037
  11. MARENGO, J. A.; GALDOS, M. V.; CHALLINOR, A.; CUNHA, A. P.; MARIN, F. R.; VIANNA, M. D. S.; BENDER, F. Drought in Northeast Brazil: A review of agricultural and policy adaptation options for food security. Climate Resilience and Sustainability, v.1, n.1, p.e17, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.17
  12. MCLENNON, E.; DARI, B.; JHA, G.; SIHI, D.; KANKARLA, V. Regenerative agriculture and integrative permaculture for sustainable and technology driven global food production and security. Agronomy Journal, v.113, n.6, p. 4541-4559, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20814
  13. MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P.; GALVÃO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, v. 17, n.4, p.758-764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018
  14. MORUGÁN-CORONADO, A.; LINARES, C.; GÓMEZ-LÓPEZ, M. D.; FAZ, Á.; ZORNOZA, R. The impact of intercropping, tillage and fertilizer type on soil and crop yield in fruit orchards under Mediterranean conditions: A meta-analysis of field studies. Agricultural Systems, v.178, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102736
  15. Mungo, A. C., Coelho, A. P., Mingotte, F. L. C., & Lemos, L. B. (2020). O tempo de armazenamento altera a qualidade tecnológica dos grãos de genótipos de feijão comum?. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.36560/14420211266
  16. NTATSI, G.; KARKANIS, A.; TRAN, F.; SAVVAS, D.; IANNETTA, P. P. Which agronomic practices increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)? A systematic review protocol. Agronomy, v.10, n.7, p.1008, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071008
  17. PALMERO, F., FERNANDEZ, J. A., GARCIA, F. O., HARO, R. J., PRASAD, P. V., SALVAGIOTTI, F., & CIAMPITTI, I. A. A quantitative review into the contributions of biological nitrogen fixation to agricultural systems by grain legumes. European Journal of Agronomy, v. 136, p.126514, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2022.126514
  18. Pereira, C. S., Fiorini , I. V. A., Delmonstes , B. de L. ., Lange, A., & Silva , A. A. da . (2021). Avaliação de doses de enxofre em cultivares de feijão-caupi (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.36560/141020211426
  19. RAI, P. K.; SINGH, M.; ANAND, K.; SAURABH, S.; KAUR, T.; KOUR, D.; KUMAR, M. Role and potential applications of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. In New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering, p. 49-60, 2020. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00004-X
  20. REINPRECHT, Y.; SCHRAM, L.; MARSOLAIS, F.; SMITH, T. H.; HILL, B.; PAULS, K. P. Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen fixation in commonbean production. Frontiers in Plant Science, v.11, p.1172, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01172
  21. SAVVAS, D.; GRUDA, N. Application of soilless culture technologies in the modern greenhouse industry—A review. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci, v.83, n.5, p.280-293, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17660/eJHS.2018/83.5.2
  22. SOUZA, M. T. D.; SILVA, M. D.; CARVALHO, R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, v. 8, n.1, p.102-106, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
  23. Souza, J. da S. ., Martins, A. F. ., & Pedrosa, L. M. . (2021). Importância de bactérias fixadoras de nitrogênio no cultivo do feijão-caupi vigna unguiculata l. (walp. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.36560/14920211456
  24. UEBERSAX, M. A.; CICHY, K. A.; GOMEZ, F. E.; PORCH, T. G.; HEITHOLT, J.; OSORNO, J. M.; KAMFWA, K.; SNAPP, S. S.; BALES, S. Dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as a vital component of sustainable agriculture and food security - A review. Legume Science, v.5, n.1, p.e155, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.155
  25. URSI, E. S. Prevenção de lesões de pele no pré-operatório:revisão integrativa da literatura [Master's thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil], 2005. Disponível em: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/22/22132/tde-18072005-095456/pt-br.php. Acessado em: 02 de junho de 2023.
  26. VAN DIJK, M.; MORLEY, T.; RAU, M. L.; SAGHAI, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nature Food, v.2, n.7, p.494-501, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00322-9
  27. YIN, R. K. Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. (D. Bueno, Trans.; D. da Silva, Ed.). Penso, 2016.
  28. YOUNG, M. D.; ROS, G. H.; VRIES, W. Impacts of agronomic measures on crop, soil, and environmental indicators: A review and synthesis of meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v.319, p.107551, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107551
  29. ZANDALINAS, S. I.; FRITSCHI, F. B.; MITTLER, R. Global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution: recipe for a multifactorial stress combination disaster. Trends in Plant Science, v.26, n.6, p.588-599, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011

How to Cite

Silva, J. H. B. da ., s, D. M. de A. ., Silva, K. M. ., Custódio , B. A. ., Barbosa, J. M. da S. ., Silva, J. S. L. da ., … da Mata, D. A. . (2023). Agronomic methods aiming quality and production increase in bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): An integrative review. Scientific Electronic Archives, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.36560/161220231816