Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o rodapé
Scientific Electronic Archives
Ciências Agrárias
DOI: 10.36560/1252019796
Enviado: 2018-11-20
Publicado: 2019-10-10

Long life tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum): price is quality?

Universidade Federal de Goiás
Commercial Viability CEASA Post-harvest Marketing Standard.

Resumo

The commercialization of the tomato has significant relevance in the national and international market. Thus, the purpose of this paper was to elucidate if the marketing price of the same is really related to its quality. The fruits were collected monthly from February to August at different points of sale in CEASA-Go, susceptible to variable storage conditions: "Boxe" (wholesale market) and "Pedras" (rural producer) and evaluated for commercial price, origin, firmness, staining, vitamin C, soluble solids and acidity. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 2 x 7 factorial scheme (2 collection points and 7 collection periods) in three replications. The tomatoes marketed in the "stones" presented lower prices throughout the experiment. Regarding the physical and chemical parameters (staining and firmness, vitamin C, soluble solids and acidity), no significant differences were observed between the different collection points. Although there were no significant differences in quality between the marketing points, those marketed in the boxes had a higher commercial value.

Referências

  1. AOAC. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 16 ed. Arlington: Ed. Patrícia Cuniff,. v. 2, p. 37-10, 42-2, 1997.
  2. ANDREUCCETTI, C., FERREIRA, M. D., TAVARES, M. Perfil dos compradores de tomate em supermercados da região de Campinas. Hortic Bras., vol. 23, p.232–238, 2005.
  3. ARIAS, R., LEE, T.C., LOGENDRA, L., JANES, H.. Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*, a*, b* color readings of a hydroponic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content. J Agric Food Chem. vol.48, p.1697–1702, 2000.
  4. BORGUINI, R.G., SILVA, M.V. Características físico-químicas e sensorias do tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum) produzido por cultivo orgânico em comparação ao convencional*. Aliment e Nutr Araraquara, vol.16. p.355–361, 2009.
  5. CALBO, A.G., NERY; A.A. Medida de firmeza em hortaliça pela técnica de aplanação. Hortic Bras, vol.2, p.14–18, 1995.
  6. CANTWELL, M., NIE, X., HONG, G. Impact of Storage Conditions on Grape Tomato Quality. Symp A Q J Mod Foreign Lit. p.3–10, 2009.
  7. CHITARRA, M.I.F., CHITARRA, A.B. Pós-colheita de frutas e hortaliças: fisiologia e manuseio. 2nd ed. Lavras, 2005.
  8. FAO. FAOSTAT. Statistics Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Annual crop production statistics.http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. 2018.
  9. FERREIRA, D.F. Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciênc. Agrotec., vol.38, pp. 109-112, 2014.
  10. IBGE. Pesquisa mensal de previsão e acompanhamento das safras agrícolas no ano civil. Estatística da produção agrícola. Janeiro 2018. Inst Bras Geogr e Estatística - IBGE. 14–49, 2018.
  11. GOIÃS. Centrais de Abastecimento de Goiás S/S (CEASA-GO). Regulamento de mercado da Central de Abastecimento de Goiás S/A (CEASA-GO)http://www.ceasa.goias.gov.br/ArquivosSiteCeasa/legislacao/Leis/regulamento.pdf (2009).
  12. LEE, S.K., KADER, A.A. Preharvest and postharvest factors influencing vitamin C content of horticultural crops. Postharvest Biol Technol., vol.20 p.207–220, 2000.
  13. LUTZ, A. Óleos E Gorduras. Métodos físicos-quimicos para análise Aliment. 2008; p. 589–625

Como Citar

Gonçalves, D. C., Morgado, C. M. A., Silva, E. P., Corrêa, G. C., Nascimento, A. R., & Cunha Junior, L. C. (2019). Long life tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum): price is quality?. Scientific Electronic Archives, 12(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.36560/1252019796