Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Agricultural Science
Published: 2022-02-28

Evaluation of artificial diets on the biological development of Marava arachidis (Dermaptera: Labiidae) and Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Forficulidae)

Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Dermaptera, artificial diet. mass creation

Abstract

The earwigs stand out for their high voracity, feeding on eggs and immature stages of pest insects of different orders. The aim of this study was to compare artificial diets for low-cost maintenance of M. arachidis and E. annulipes

creations under laboratory conditions. The research was carried out at the Laboratório de Invertebrados of the Departamento de Biociências of the Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), Campus II, Areia, PB. The number and duration of instars, nymphal viability and numbers of individuals obtained in the F1 generation were evaluated. Five artificial diets were tested, containing starter feed for broiler chicken, wheat bran, powdered milk, brewer's yeast and nipagin. The difference between the diets was the starter ration for chicken with different sources of nutrients. The experimental design was completely randomized, in a factorial scheme (5 diets x 2 predators). Data were submitted to Analysis of Variance by the F test and the means were compared by the Scott-Knott test (p≤ 0.05). In the instar duration of E. annulipes and M. arachidis there was no interaction, but in the first there was a significant effect for the isolated factors, in the treatments the prestarter/integral mix caused a reduction in the average duration of the instars. On nymphal viability of E. annulipes, the control had a greater effect with about 90%. In the nymphal viability of M. arachidis there was no interaction between treatments. However, it was greater than 50% in all treatments. In the number of nymphs obtained in the F1 generation of the scissors, there was no difference between treatments. The artificial diet containing the pre-starter/whole mix feed reduces the average duration of E. annulipes instars; the different artificial diets do not interfere in the mean duration of M. arachidis instars; scissors obtain considerable viability indices for diet-independent rearing; artificial diets do not affect the earwigs reproductive cycle.

References

  1. ALVES, P. R. R. et al. Desenvolvimento e reprodução de Pygidicrana v-nigrum (Dermaptera: Pygidicranidae) alimentada com dieta artificial. PesquisAgro, v. 2, n. 1, p. 24-33, 2019.
  2. CHAPMAN, R. F.; SIMPSON, S. J.; DOUGLAS, A. E. The insects: structure and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 81-107.
  3. COHEN, A. C. Formalizing insect rearing and artificial diet technology. American Entomologist, Lanham, v. 47, p. 198-206, 2001.
  4. COHEN, A. C. Insect diets: science and technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015. p. 1-164.
  5. COSTA, J. V. B. et al. Desenvolvimento de Euborellia annulipes (Lucas) (Dermaptera: Carcinophoridae) em dietas artificiais com diferentes teores de proteína. In: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo-Artigo em anais de congresso (ALICE). In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROECOLOGIA, 7., 2011, Fortaleza.
  6. COSTA, N. P.; OLIVEIRA, H. D.; BRITO, C. H.; SILVA, A. B. Influência do nim na Biologia do predador Euborellia annulipes e estudo de parâmetros para sua criação massal. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra, v. 7, n. 2, p. 10, 2007.
  7. GALLO D, NAKANO O, SILVEIRA NETO S, CARVALHO, R.P.L, BATISTA G.C., BERTI FILHO E, PARRA, J.R.P., ZUCHHI R.A., ALVES S.B., VENDRAMIM J.D. (2002) Entomologia agrícola. São Paulo: Ceres, 920p.
  8. GUIMARÃES, J. H.; TUCCI, E. C.; OMES, J. P. C. Dermaptera (Insecta) associados a aviários industri- ais no estado de São Paulo e sua importância como agentes de controle biológicos de pragas avícolas. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, São Paulo, v. 36, n. 3, p. 527-534, 1992.
  9. GUIMARÃES, M.R.F., et al. Avanços na Metodologia de Criação de Doru luteipes (Scudder, 1876) (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). Sete Lagoas – MG, 7p, 2006.
  10. HENSLEY, S. D. Management of sugar cane borer populations in Louisiana, a decade of change. Entomophaga, Paris, v. 16, n. 1, p. 133-146, 1971.
  11. KLOSTERMEYER, E. C. The life history and habits of the ring-legged earwig, Euborellia annulipes Lucas. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, v. 15, p. 13-18, 1942.
  12. LANGSTON, R. L.; POWELL, J. A. The earwigs of California (Order Dermaptera). Bullet of the California Insect Survey, v. 20, p. 1-25, 1975.
  13. LEMOS, W. P. Biologia e exigências térmicas de Euborrelia annulipes (Lucas, 1847) (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae), predador do bicudo-do- algodoeiro. 1997. 132 f. Monografia (Graduação em Agronomia) – Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia, 1997.
  14. LEMOS, W. P.; MEDEIROS, R. S.; RAMALHO, F. S. Influência da temperatura no desenvolvimento de Euborellia annulipes (Lucas) (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae), predador do Bicudo-do-Algodoeiro. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, v. 27, n. 1, p. 67-76, 1998.
  15. PARRA, J.R.P. Consumo e utilização de alimentos por insetos. In: PANIZZI, A.R.; PARRA, J.R.P. (Ed.). Ecologia nutricional de insetos e suas implicações no manejo de pragas. São Paulo: Editora Manole, 1991. Cap. 2, p.289-311.
  16. PINTO, D. M.; STORCH, G.; COSTA, M. Biologia de Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) em laboratório. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Agronomia, Garças, n. 8, dez. 2005.
  17. RAMALHO, F. S.; WANDERLEY, P. A. Ecology and management of the boll weevil in South American cotton. American Entomological, v. 42, n. 1, p. 41-47, 1996.
  18. RAMAMURTHI, B. N.; SOLAYAPPAN, A. R. Dermaptera predators in the biological regulation of sugarcane borers in India. Current Science, v. 49, n. 2, p. 72-73, 1980.
  19. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. R Foundation a For Statistical Computing. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Viena, Áustria. 2006. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Disponível em: http://www.R-project.org Acesso em: 03 de julho de 2021.
  20. SILVA, A. B.; BATISTA, J. L; BRITO, C. H. Capacidade Predatória de Euborellia annulipes (Lucas, 1847) sobre Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797). Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, v. 31, n. 1, p. 7- 11, 2010.
  21. SILVA, A. B., BRITO, J., M. Bioecologia de Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae). Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável, Pombal Pb, v. 09, n. 05, p.55-61, 14 dez. 2014.
  22. THOMPSON, S. N. 1999. Nutrition and culture of entomophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 44, p. 561-592.

How to Cite

Ferreira, R. R. ., Abreu, K. G., Oliveira Filho, M. C. de ., Ferreira, R. R. ., Salustino, A. da S. ., v, M. de M. D. ., & Brito, C. H. de . (2022). Evaluation of artificial diets on the biological development of Marava arachidis (Dermaptera: Labiidae) and Euborellia annulipes (Dermaptera: Forficulidae). Scientific Electronic Archives, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.36560/15320221521