Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Scientific Electronic Archives
Agricultural Science
DOI: 10.36560/14420211266
Submitted: 2020-09-29
Published: 2020-10-28

Does storage time change the grain technological quality of common bean genotypes?

Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal.
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal
Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivares linhagens tempo de cozimento.

Abstract

Assessments of the grain technological quality of common bean genotypes are essential to indicate the best cultivars and lines for farmers and breeding programs. However, factors such as storage time can alter the grain technological quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of storage time on the grain technological quality of common bean genotypes and to indicate the cultivars and lines with the best grain characteristics. The experiment was conducted at Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Jaboticabal/SP. The experimental design used was a randomized block, in a 10x2 factorial scheme, consisting of ten bean genotypes from the Carioca commercial group and two periods of grain storage. The treatments were represented by ten bean genotypes, four control cultivars and six bean lines, and two storage periods (30 and 180 days after harvest). The technological variables evaluated were the cooking time, time for maximum hydration of the grains and hydration ratio. The storage time reduces the grain technological quality of common bean genotypes, given the increase in the cooking time of the beans over 180 days of storage. The cultivar BRS Estilo and the lineage CNFC11962 are the genotypes that present the best grain technological characteristics, because, in addition to maintaining the time for maximum hydration throughout the storage period, it has a low time for grains cooking.

References

  1. AMBROSANO, E.J.; WUTKE, E.B.; BULISANI, E.A.; CANTARELLA, H. Feijão. In: RAIJ, B.V.; CANTARELLA, H.; QUAGGIO, J.A.; FURLANI, A.M.C. Recomendação de adubação e calagem para o Estado de São Paulo. Campinas: IAC, 2.ed, n.100, p.194-195, 1997. Boletim Técnico.
  2. CONAB. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira (grãos). v.7, safra 2019/20, n.4, quarto levantamento, 2020. Disponível em: < https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos> Acesso em 25 fev. 2020.
  3. EMBRAPA – Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Sistema brasileira de classificação de solo. Santos et al. (Eds). 3 ed. Brasília, DF, Brasil, 353 p., 2013.
  4. FAGERIA, N.K.; MELO, L.C.; FERREIRA, E.P.B.; OLIVEIRA, J.P.; KNUPP, A.M. Dry matter, grain yield, and yield components of dry bean as influenced by nitrogen fertilization and rhizobia. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v. 45, n. 1, p. 111-125, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.848877
  5. FARINELLI, R.; LEMOS, L.B. Produtividade, eficiência agronômica, características nutricionais e tecnológicas do feijão adubado com nitrogênio em plantio direto e convencional. Bragantia, v. 69, n. 1, p. 165-172, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052010000100021
  6. FERREIRA, D.F. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001
  7. TERRA, F.S.A.; COELHO, A.P.; BETTIOL, J.V.T.; FARINELLI, R.; LEMOS, L.B. Produtividade e qualidade dos grãos de cultivares de feijoeiro cultivado na safra das águas e de inverno. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía, v. 118, n. 2, p. 1-10, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24215/16699513e026

How to Cite

Mungo, A. C., Coelho, A. P., Mingotte, F. L. C., & Lemos, L. B. (2020). Does storage time change the grain technological quality of common bean genotypes?. Scientific Electronic Archives, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.36560/14420211266