Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Scientific Electronic Archives
Education and Teaching
DOI: 10.36560/17520241984
Submitted: 2024-07-22
Published: 2024-08-28

STREΑMING: A Comprehensive Approach to Inclusive STEM Education

Net Media Lab Mind - Brain R&D ΙΙΤ - N.C.S.R. "Demokritos" , Athens, Greece
Net Media Lab Mind - Brain R&D ΙΙΤ - N.C.S.R. "Demokritos" , Athens, Greece / Department of Primary Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GREECE
STREAMING STEM education Inclusive education Gamification Robotics in education Underrepresented students

Abstract

This article introduces the innovative concept of STREAMING, which integrates Science, Technology, Robotics, Engineering, A.I, Mathematics, Intelligence & Emotional Intelligence, Inclusion, and Gamification to create a comprehensive and inclusive educational framework. By examining existing literature, this narrative review highlights the potential of STREMING to enhance educational practices and ensure equal opportunities for all students, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds. Key findings from various studies emphasize the effectiveness of inclusive STEM high schools, the benefits of integrating Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and the impact of gamification on student engagement and learning outcomes. The review demonstrates that STREAMING can foster a more inclusive, engaging, and effective educational environment, equipping students with the necessary skills and knowledge to navigate and contribute to an increasingly complex and technologically advanced society.

References

  1. Basham, J. D., Israel, M., & Maynard, K. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM for all. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 9–19.
  2. Basham, J. D., & Marino, M. T. (2013). Understanding STEM Education and Supporting Students through Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45(4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500401
  3. Collins, J. A., &Fauser, B. C. J. M. (2005). Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Human Reproduction Update, 11(2), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh058
  4. Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7–27.
  5. Ghergulescu, I., Lynch, T., Bratu, M., Moldovan, A.-N., Muntean, C. H., &Muntean, G.-M. (2018). Stem Education With Atomic Structure Virtual Lab for Learners With Special Education Needs. EDULEARN18 Proceedings, 1(November 2021), 8747–8752. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2018.2033
  6. Kefalis, C., Stavridis, S., &Drigas, A. (2023). O LABORATÓRIO DE CIÊNCIAS DA ESCOLA DO FUTURO. TECNOLOGIAS E CONTEÚDOS EMERGENTES. RECIMA21-Revista Científica Multidisciplinar-ISSN 2675-6218, 4(5), e453033–e453033.
  7. Klimaitis, C. C., & Mullen, C. A. (2021). Including K-12 Students with Disabilities in STEM Education and Planning for Inclusion. Educational Planning, 28(2), 27–43. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1301785%0Ahttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1301785.pdf
  8. LaForce, M., Noble, E., King, H., Century, J., Blackwell, C., Holt, S., Ibrahim, A., & Loo, S. (2016). The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0054-z
  9. Lynch, S. J., Burton, E. P., Behrend, T., House, A., Ford, M., Spillane, N., Matray, S., Han, E., & Means, B. (2018). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 712–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437
  10. Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Lynch, S., Peters, V., Young, V., & Allen, C. (2017). Expanding STEM opportunities through inclusive STEM-focused high schools. Science Education, 101(5), 681–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21281
  11. Sakulkueakulsuk, B., Witoon, S., Ngarmkajornwiwat, P., Pataranutapom, P., Surareungchai, W., Pataranutaporn, P., &Subsoontorn, P. (2018). Kids making AI: Integrating Machine Learning, Gamification, and Social Context in STEM Education. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2018, December, 1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615249
  12. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  13. Street, C. D. (2012). Expanding Access to STEM for At-Risk Learners: A New Application of Universal Design for Instruction. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability., 25(4), 363–375.
  14. Zhao, D., Playfoot, J., De Nicola, C., Guarino, G., Bratu, M., Di Salvadore, F., &Muntean, G. M. (2022). An Innovative Multi-Layer Gamification Framework for Improved STEM Learning Experience. IEEE Access, 10, 3879–3889. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139729

How to Cite

Drigas, A., & Kefalis, C. (2024). STREΑMING: A Comprehensive Approach to Inclusive STEM Education. Scientific Electronic Archives, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.36560/17520241984