Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o rodapé
Ciências Agrárias
Publicado: 2024-06-28

Plant training systems for the peach cultivar Della Nona

Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
central leader, fruticulture, productivity, Prunus persica


Cultivation of stone fruit trees in many producing countries is traditionally carried out with low planting density and training in open plant systems (pots). However, the higher density systems and training with more compact mills, for example the 'leading system', have been providing better production. The objective of this work was to evaluate the phenological, vegetative, and productive characteristics of the peach cultivar Della Nona, subjected to various training systems. The work was conducted during two production cycles where three driving systems were evaluated: 'central leader' (5.0 m x 0.8 m, 2,500 plants ha-1), 'Y shape' (5.0 m x 1.5 m, 1,333 plants ha-1) and 'vase' (5.0 m x 3.5 m, 571 plants ha-1). We showed that phenological development was not influenced by the different training systems. The training system 'central leader' gave lower cup size, lower production, but higher productivity. We conclude that the 'central leader' training system adapts to the conditions of the region and shows high productivity for the peach cultivar Della Nona.


  1. Cantillano R. F. F., Castañeda L. M. F., Almeida G. V. B., and Watanabe H. S. (2008). Integrated production of peaches: post-harvest handling and logistics. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado. Retrieved from:
  2. Costa, V. B., and Fachinello, J. C. (2014). Physical-chemical characterization of ‘Eldorado’ peaches grown in different systems of conduction in the Pelotas region, Rio Grande do Sul. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, 20, 16-24.
  3. Glenn, D. M., Tworkoski, T., Scorza, R., and Miller, S. S. (2011). Long-term effects of peach production systems for standard and pillar growth types on yield and economic parameters. HortTechnology, 21, 720-725.
  4. Grossman, Y. L., and DeJong, T. M. (1998). Training and pruning system effects on vegetative growth potential, light interception, and cropping efficiency in peach trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 123 (6), 1058-1064.
  6. He, F., Wang, F., Wei, Q., Wang, X., and Zhang, Q. (2008). Relationships Between the distribution of Relative Canopy Light Intensity and the Peach Yield and Quality. Agricultural Sciences in China. 7(3), 297-302. Doi:
  7. IBGE. Produção brasileira de pessegueiro. (2022). Disponível em: Acesso em: 3 fev. 2024.
  8. INMET. (2017). Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. 2017. Taken from:
  9. ISLAM M. S. et al. A Ground-based Platform for Reliable Estimates of Fruit Number, Size, and Color in Stone Fruit Orchards. Horttech. December 2022 32(6).
  10. KHROMYKH, N. O. et al. Cuticular wax composition of mature leaves of species and hybrids of the genus Prunus differing in resistance to clasterosporium disease. Biosystems Diversity, 28(4), 370–375, 2020. doi:10.15421/012047
  11. Kumar, M., Rawat, V., Rawat, J. M. S., and Tomar, Y. K. (2010). Effect of pruning intensity on peach yield and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 125, 218-221. Doi:
  12. Lauri, P. E., and Grappadelli, L. C. (2014). Tree architecture, flowering and fruiting – thoughts on training, pruning and ecophysiology. Acta Horticulturae, 1058, 291-298. Doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1058.34
  13. LEZZER, P. et al. Influences of Propagation Method, Rootstock, Number of Axes, and Cultivation Site on ‘Fuji’ Scions Grown as Single or Multi‐Leader Trees in the Nursery. Agronomy, 2022, 12, 224. 10.3390/agronomy12010224
  14. MANGANARIS G. A. et al. Peach for the future: A specialty crop revisited. Scientia Horticulturae. v. 305, 2022. 111390.
  15. Marini, R. P., and Sowers, D. S. (2000). Peach tree growth, yield, and profitability as influenced by tree form and tree density. HortScience, 35(5), 837-842.
  16. Mayer, N. A., Neves, T. R., Rocha, C. T., and Silva, V. A. L. (2016). High planting density on ‘Chimarrita’ peach. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, 15(1), 50-59. Doi:
  17. Mayer, N. A., and Pereira, F. M. (2011). Productivity of ‘Aurora-1’ peach trees as affected by spacing and propagation methods of ‘Okinawa’ rootstock. Bragantia, 71, 372-376. Doi:
  18. Pasa, M.S., Fachinello, J. C., Schmitz, J. D., Rosa Júnior, H. F., Franceschi, É., Carra, B., Giovanaz, M. A., and Silva C. P. (2017). Early performance of ‘Kampai’ and ‘Rubimel’ peach on 3 training systems. Bragantia, 76, 82-85. Doi:
  19. Stassen, P. J. C. (2015). Development of Pruning and Training Systems for Higher Density Peach Orchards in South Africa. Acta Horticulturae, 1084, 343-350. Doi:
  20. Taiz, L., and Zeiger, E. (2009). Plant Physiology. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed. 819p.
  21. Zec, G., Colić, S., Vulić, T., Milatović, D., Oparnica, C., Đorđević, B., and Đurović, D. (2016). The influence of training system on fruit characteristics of peach and nectarine cultivars. Acta Horticulturae, 1139, 541-544. Doi: 1

Como Citar

Giacobbo, C. L., Prado, J. do, Uberti, A., Lugaresi, A., & Fischer, L. L. de O. (2024). Plant training systems for the peach cultivar Della Nona. Scientific Electronic Archives, 17(4).